Wednesday, October 30, 2019
Saturday, October 19, 2019
Friday, October 18, 2019
Monday, October 7, 2019
Thoughts on creating organic software as human extension ?
Some thoughts on my previous question on software being an extension to human
- How to ensure effective human engagement in software processes ?
- How can humans be the key that software needs to unlock for its processes ?
- How can you create a unbreakable link back from any working software to a human ?
- How can a software be better when paired with human where humans have the one way control route ?
- How can software be an true extension of human with a unique fingerprint like identity linked to a human identity ?
- How effective can the interactions be between human and software so that software can truly augment the human to perform better ?
Labels:
ai
,
ai-governance
,
ai-human-association
,
ai-human-idendity
,
augmented-ai
,
organic-software
Reactions: |
Saturday, October 5, 2019
What is it that humans can provide to AI that AI will need forever ?
Just a thought question that came into mind from the current examples in the world. Any AI solution created so far for making the human effort lesser also has a tendency of no human effort at all. Are there any efforts on this aspect of the symbiotic between human and AI ?
Aspects like how to
- Contain ? - Like humans with identity
- Control ? - With Human decisions and Human collaboration and Human consensus
- Maintain ? - Learning life-cycle with humans
An example below of this symbiotic:
An example blockchain system of human collaboration and consensus tied to AI learning life-cycle and control aspects. The more learning the more collaboration and consensus of humans will be involved. In this example AI will be like a fitness trainer helping Humans to collaborate and work better and aimed towards truly augmenting the green circle in the diagram.
Still the question remains unanswered is:
- Are there any best standards or frameworks for AI Governance which is agnostic of any AI and can manage the above aspects separately ?
- Should AI be treated as a external entity and should there be any clear protocol enforced (principals / laws / governance) for any interaction with human and their resources ?
- Should every AI identify itself as a Human extension with a unbreakable link to a Human before handling human owned resources so that the responsibility chain for augmentation is established ?
Labels:
ai
,
ai-governance
,
ai-human-association
,
ai-human-idendity
,
augmented-ai
,
human-link-to-ai
Reactions: |
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)